data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5925/d5925be5789d864fb3dcbecf5984cd1acc02463e" alt=""
J.J.'s message (besides the one about his charity) is obvious. Episode VII won't just feature a few actors in a green screen room talking to thin air. Episode VII will include real models of starships, on-location shooting, extensive background characters, and yes, even some puppets.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4041c/4041ccadf4244933b478ec43dd52f9f7da8f16a8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/943c2/943c2b7fc999d060b5d63665d0fc9559807a715c" alt=""
Before answering that question, I want to talk about how successful the original trilogy was with its puppet usage. First of all, 1980 Yoda is far more impressive than 2005 Yoda. He has more heart, more soul, he feels more real. He's weird and proud of it. CGI Yoda is kind of a parody of the original character. He's a little too cutsie. Yoda isn't suppose to be cute. He's an old hairy, crusty, wise mentor with some of the most beautiful lines that cinema has ever given us.
But beyond Yoda we still have some great puppets. Jabba the Hutt needed 6 puppeteers to operate. He looks way more menacing in the original than his "Phantom Menace" doppelganger does. Taun Taun's feel real to me. The Rancor is scary. Even Admiral "It's a Trap" Ackbar is a freaking puppet.
The only puppet in the original trilogy that didn't feel quite real was Salacious Crumb, Jabba's little pet lizard monkey. Crumb is a popular Star Wars character but a little on the annoying side- Definitely a character who is there for the comic relief and not much else. Though he does look pretty scary, I'll give him that.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/08f28/08f28fcc414444b06a398c697c5673aed9745452" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a2584/a2584346329334f6791a423ce19c304f70b13d8b" alt=""
![]() |
Animatronics technology was used for the Rancor |
To find a current filmmaker who still uses puppets, we have to dig a little deeper - as deep as Guillermo del Toro. Guillermo still uses puppetry and animatronic robots in all his projects. Creatures in "Pan's Labyrinth", the "Hellboy" films and even "Pacific Rim" are essentially puppets. The only difference is that del Toro blends the puppetry with some CGI. There's no fake-feel to anything del Toro does. Pan's Labyrinth is pure movie-magic. All movies should feel magical, and CGI rarely aids this process. Bad CGI (like bad puppetry) looks cheap and feels wrong.
![]() |
An Early Design for Taun Tauns |
Abrams seems to have a pro-practical-effects philosophy coming into this film. Fans are starting to feel that and they are jumping on board. Abrams has a lot of pressure on his shoulders, perhaps more pressure than Lucas was under when releasing the prequels. I think some strategically placed-puppets will give the viewers some nice nostalgia whilst giving the Star Wars universe a true 80s movie-magic feeling. This is something big budget films have been missing for, oh, I'd say about 30-years.
No comments:
Post a Comment