More than 50-years ago a veteran World War II combat pilot created a TV show about an exploratory space vessel. That World War II combat pilot was named Gene Roddenberry, the TV show was called “Star Trek”, and the exploratory space vessel was the USS Enterprise. Through the years, fans have watched “Star Trek” grow from a 3-season series into a 50-year franchise. And in 2017, “Star Trek” became something more than a franchise, “Star Trek” is now a genre.
Some
will scoff at the very idea that “Star Trek” could be a genre. “How can a genre
be created? Aren’t genres set in stone?” skeptics will ask. But if we look back
at history, genres are created all the time. Did not Edgar Allen Poe create the
“Detective Story Genre” in 1843, when he penned “The Murders in the Rue
Morgue”. Did not Tolkien create the
“High Fantasy Genre” in 1937 when he published “The Hobbit”. Did not high
school students, Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster invent the “Super Hero Genre”
when they sketched a space-man with tights and a cape?
All
this tells us that “Star Trek” can be a genre. The genre may lack a name, but
if 2017 taught us anything, it is that this genre does exist.
2017
was a big year for Trek. In September, CBS gave us the first “Star Trek”
television series in a dozen years. Just a week earlier, FOX launched its own “Star
Trek” series, under the name of “The Orville”. And then in December Netflix
gave us the Black Mirror episode “USS Callister”, a 76-minute big budget
episode which is clearly in the “Star Trek” genre.
Some
might label “The Orville” and “USS Callister” as mere parodies of “Star Trek”, and
yet they are so much more. “The Orville”, in particular, was advertised as a
comedy by FOX, but viewers were quick to learn that the Seth McFarlane show is
high-concept sci-fi. Episodes such as “About a Girl” and “Majority Rule” are
Science Fiction at its best. Strangely enough, “The Orville” has a lot more in
common with the original “Star Trek” and “The Next Generation” than “Discovery”
does.
Seth
McFarlane claims that “The Orville” is his answer to the
Post-Battlestar-Galactica Science Fiction TV landscape. Where shows such as
“Black Mirror”, “Westworld”, and “Sense8” show dystopian futures, “The Orville”
delivers a Rodenberry-Esque era of galactic peace and scientific prosperity not
seen since the days of TNG.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d66ba/d66ba4472dd34493f45b8bf8e04d1c4861e1a20a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fcf53/fcf537115af7e5944239b0e9074d3335178027a0" alt=""
When
I showed my wife the episode “USS Callister”, she thought it was a pilot
episode for a series. While she admitted that she enjoyed the episode, she was
confused about how the rest of the series would proceed. The answer, of course,
is that there is no further series of “USS Callister” because “Black Mirror” is
an anthology show. There is, however, a second season of television ordered for both
“Discovery” and “The Orville”.
If
you were to ask me personally, I couldn’t tell you which series’ second season
I am looking more forward to. I am very eager to reconnect with “Orville”
characters such as Bortus and Alara, who are as lovable as Warf or Deanna Troi.
Yet, one cannot discount the “Star Trek Discovery” characters. Doug Jones’ Seru
is a particular favorite of mine.
The
closing minutes of the “Discovery” finale does bring hope for the future,
especially to those fans that hope that “Discovery” will make a transition away
from the genre of “Darkest Sci-Fi” into the genre of “Star Trek”. (Did I
mention that “Star Trek” is a genre now?) But even when new television shows try
to emulate Roddenberry’s bright hopeful future, we must remember that “Trek” is
not beholden to its past. Instead, “Star Trek” should always endeavor to
“boldly go where no one has gone before”.